Pro League
Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.
The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
Kortrijk
Waregem
Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
Half-time score: 1–0
| # | Team | K | V | U | T | +/− | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Antwerp
|
11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | +15 | 30 |
| 2 |
Genk
|
10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | +19 | 28 |
| 3 |
Club Brugge
|
11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | +11 | 22 |
| 4 |
St. Gilloise
|
9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | +7 | 22 |
| 5 |
Oud-Heverlee Leuven
|
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | +3 | 20 |
| 6 |
Anderlecht
|
12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | +9 | 19 |
| 7 |
Charleroi
|
12 | 6 | 0 | 6 | +0 | 18 |
| 8 |
Standard
|
9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | -1 | 15 |
| 9 |
Westerlo
|
10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | -1 | 14 |
| 10 |
Gent
|
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | +6 | 13 |
| 11 |
St Truiden
|
11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | -1 | 13 |
| 12 |
Kortrijk
|
12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | -8 | 13 |
| 13 |
Oostende
|
12 | 3 | 3 | 6 | -4 | 12 |
| 14 |
Mechelen
|
12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 11 |
| 15 | Seraing | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -8 | 11 |
| 16 |
Seraing United
|
12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -8 | 11 |
| 17 |
Eupen
|
12 | 3 | 0 | 9 | -13 | 9 |
| 18 |
Waregem
|
12 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -14 | 8 |
| 19 |
Cercle Brugge
|
8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -7 | 6 |
Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.
M. Ilić
G
T. Watanabe
D
S. Tanaka
M
Coach: A. Čustović
L. Bostyn
G
A. Ciranni
D
L. Willen
D
N. Dismas
D
N. Rommens
M
A. Fadera
F
Coach: M. Leye
Green columns are the outcomes that came in.
Genk
Kortrijk
Kortrijk
Antwerp
Anderlecht
Kortrijk
Kortrijk
Mechelen
Eupen
Kortrijk
B Put · 107 kamper i vår database
🟥 Red cards: 0,27 per match
The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.