Pro League
Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.
The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
Kortrijk
Antwerp
Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
Half-time score: 2–0
| # | Team | K | V | U | T | +/− | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Antwerp
|
9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | +14 | 27 |
| 2 |
Genk
|
9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | +18 | 25 |
| 3 |
Club Brugge
|
10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | +13 | 22 |
| 4 |
St. Gilloise
|
8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | +6 | 19 |
| 5 |
Charleroi
|
11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | +1 | 18 |
| 6 |
Oud-Heverlee Leuven
|
10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | +0 | 17 |
| 7 |
Anderlecht
|
11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | +7 | 16 |
| 8 |
St Truiden
|
9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 13 |
| 9 |
Standard
|
8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -2 | 12 |
| 10 |
Mechelen
|
11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | -3 | 11 |
| 11 |
Gent
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | +2 | 10 |
| 12 |
Oostende
|
10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -4 | 10 |
| 13 |
Kortrijk
|
10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -8 | 10 |
| 14 |
Westerlo
|
7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -3 | 9 |
| 15 | Seraing | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -8 | 9 |
| 16 |
Seraing United
|
10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -8 | 9 |
| 17 |
Waregem
|
11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -11 | 8 |
| 18 |
Cercle Brugge
|
7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | -6 | 6 |
| 19 |
Eupen
|
10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | -10 | 6 |
Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.
M. Ilić
G
T. Watanabe
D
S. Tanaka
M
Coach: A. Čustović
J. Butez
G
W. Pacho
D
C. Stengs
M
K. Miyoshi
M
Coach: M. van Bommel
Green columns are the outcomes that came in.
Anderlecht
Kortrijk
Kortrijk
Mechelen
Eupen
Kortrijk
Kortrijk
Standard
Club Brugge
Kortrijk
B Van Driessche · 123 kamper i vår database
🟥 Red cards: 0,20 per match
The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.