Ligue 2
Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.
The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
Dijon
Quevilly Rouen
Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
Half-time score: 0–0
| # | Team | K | V | U | T | +/− | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bordeaux
|
11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | +11 | 23 |
| 2 |
Amiens
|
11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | +5 | 23 |
| 3 |
Le Havre
|
11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | +14 | 22 |
| 4 |
Sochaux
|
11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | +12 | 22 |
| 5 |
Valenciennes
|
11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 19 |
| 6 |
Caen
|
11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | +5 | 18 |
| 7 |
Guingamp
|
11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | +2 | 18 |
| 8 |
Paris FC
|
12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | +0 | 16 |
| 9 |
Grenoble
|
11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | -1 | 16 |
| 10 |
Bastia
|
11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 16 |
| 11 |
Metz
|
11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | +1 | 14 |
| 12 |
Quevilly Rouen
|
11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | -4 | 13 |
| 13 |
Annecy
|
11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | +0 | 12 |
| 14 |
Dijon
|
11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | -4 | 12 |
| 15 |
St Etienne
|
12 | 2 | 5 | 5 | -4 | 11 |
| 16 |
Rodez
|
11 | 2 | 5 | 4 | -5 | 11 |
| 17 |
Pau FC
|
11 | 2 | 5 | 4 | -7 | 11 |
| 18 |
Laval
|
11 | 3 | 1 | 7 | -5 | 10 |
| 19 |
Nimes
|
11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -7 | 8 |
| 20 |
Niort
|
11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | -11 | 8 |
Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.
J. Marié
M
B. Soumaré
M
Coach: O. Daf
N. Lemaître
G
A. Sissoko
D
B. Pierret
M
M. Camara
M
I. Soumaré
M
L. Mafouta
F
Coach: O. Echouafni
Green columns are the outcomes that came in.
Amiens
Dijon
Dijon
Le Havre
Bordeaux
Dijon
Dijon
Sochaux
Bastia
Dijon
T Léonard · 142 kamper i vår database
🟥 Red cards: 0,23 per match
The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.