← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: R Jones
Brighton
S S U U S
2–2
Full-time
Nott'm Forest
U S U U S

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Brighton Nott'm Forest
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 59%
67%
50%
Points per game
2,3
2,0
Over 2.5 Ø 42%
67%
17%
Both score Ø 59%
50%
67%
Average goals
2,8
1,8
Scored
2,2
1,2
Conceded
0,7
0,7
Goal diff per game
+1,5
+0,5
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 4/4 matches
Win Ø 50%
50%
50%
Points per game
2,0
2,0
Over 2.5 Ø 25%
50%
0%
Both score Ø 50%
50%
50%
Average goals
2,0
1,5
Scored
1,5
1,0
Conceded
0,5
0,5
Goal diff per game
+1,0
+0,5
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 2–1

1,00 xG 1,42
70% Possession 30%
14 Shots 4
3 Shots on target 3
7 Blocked shots 1
2 Goalkeeper saves 1
9 Corners 1
0 Offside 4
12 Free kicks against 11
3 Yellow cards 4
0 Red cards 1
The table before the match Brighton 7. · Nott'm Forest 9.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Liverpool 5 4 0 1 +9 +6.4 12
2 Man City 4 4 0 0 +8 +6.3 12
3 Aston Villa 5 4 0 1 +3 +3.5 12
4 Chelsea 5 3 1 1 +6 +2.1 10
5 Arsenal 4 3 1 0 +5 +0.6 10
6 Newcastle 5 3 1 1 +1 -2.0 10
7 Brighton 4 2 2 0 +4 +2.7 8
8 Fulham 5 2 2 1 +2 +1.2 8
9 Nott'm Forest 4 2 2 0 +2 +2.2 8
10 Tottenham 5 2 1 2 +4 +3.7 7
11 Man United 5 2 1 2 +0 +3.1 7
12 Brentford 5 2 0 3 -2 -4.6 6
13 Bournemouth 5 1 2 2 -3 +0.8 5
14 West Ham 5 1 1 3 -4 -3.9 4
15 Leicester 5 0 3 2 -2 -4.2 3
16 Crystal Palace 5 0 3 2 -3 -1.7 3
17 Ipswich 5 0 3 2 -5 -7.9 3
18 Southampton 5 0 1 4 -7 -2.7 1
19 Everton 5 0 1 4 -9 -3.4 1
20 Wolves 5 0 1 4 -9 -2.3 1

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Brighton Nott'm Forest
13′
C. Wood 0–1
Carlos Baleba 🟨
25′
Danny Welbeck 🟨
39′
1–1 J. Hinshelwood
J. van Hecke
42′
44′
🟨 Ola Aina
2–1 D. Welbeck
45′
Half-time 2–1
46′
🟨 Neco Williams
46′
🔁 Jota Silva
↦ A. Elanga
46′
🔁 N. Williams
↦ Álex Moreno
46′
🔁 R. Yates
↦ J. Ward-Prowse
59′
🔁 R. Sosa
↦ E. Anderson
60′
🟨 Morgan Gibbs-White
Y. Minteh 🔁
↦ S. Adingra
62′
M. Wieffer 🔁
↦ C. Baleba
62′
64′
🟨 Jota Silva
70′
R. Sosa 2–2
Jota Silva
João Pedro 🔁
↦ G. Rutter
71′
72′
🔁 Morato
↦ C. Wood
E. Ferguson 🔁
↦ P. Estupiñán
82′
83′
🟨 Morgan Gibbs-White
83′
🟥 Morgan Gibbs-White
93′
🟨 Callum Hudson-Odoi
Lewis Dunk 🟨
94′
Full-time 2–2

Line-ups

Brighton

4-2-3-1
1 B. Verbruggen G
34 J. Veltman D
29 J. van Hecke D
5 L. Dunk D
30 P. Estupiñán D
41 J. Hinshelwood M
20 C. Baleba M
11 S. Adingra M
14 G. Rutter M
22 K. Mitoma M
18 D. Welbeck F
Bench (9)
17 Y. Minteh
27 M. Wieffer
9 João Pedro
28 E. Ferguson
10 J. Enciso
23 J. Steele
24 F. Kadıoğlu
4 A. Webster
3 Igor Julio

Coach: F. Hürzeler

Nott'm Forest

4-2-3-1
26 M. Sels G
34 O. Aina D
31 N. Milenković D
5 Murillo D
19 Álex Moreno D
18 J. Ward-Prowse M
8 E. Anderson M
14 C. Hudson-Odoi M
10 M. Gibbs-White M
21 A. Elanga M
11 C. Wood F
Bench (9)
20 Jota Silva
7 N. Williams
22 R. Yates
24 R. Sosa
4 Morato
17 E. da Silva Moreira
9 T. Awoniyi
33 Carlos Miguel
16 N. Domínguez

Coach: Nuno Espírito Santo

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
1,86
U ✓
3,83
B
4,21
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,83
U2,5
2,02
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

R Jones · 186 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,8 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
23,5 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,07 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.