League Cup
Nachträgliche Analyse — das Modell wurde nur mit Spielen trainiert, die vor diesem stattfanden.
Modellens sannsynligheter for hjemmeseier, uavgjort og borteseier — med begrunnelse og anbefalte markeder.
Lås opp med ProHar du konto? Logg inn
Cheltenham
Charlton
Forventede mål, over/under og begge lag scorer — priset av modellen før avspark.
Lås opp med ProHar du konto? Logg inn
Modellens topp sluttresultater med beste odds hos bookmakerne.
Lås opp med ProHar du konto? Logg inn
Halbzeitstand: 0–3
| # | Team | K | V | U | T | +/− | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Norwich
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 3 |
| 2 |
Wolves
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 3 |
| 3 |
Luton
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 3 |
| 4 |
West Ham
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 5 |
Blackpool
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 6 |
Stoke
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 7 |
Bradford
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 8 |
Leyton Orient
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 9 |
Cardiff
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 10 |
Crawley Town
|
2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 3 |
| 11 |
Lincoln
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 12 |
Stevenage
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 13 |
Blackburn
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 14 |
Crewe
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 15 |
Cambridge United
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 16 |
Watford
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 17 |
Leicester
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 18 |
Middlesbrough
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 19 |
Sheffield Weds
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 20 |
Birmingham
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 21 |
Walsall
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 22 |
Peterborough
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 23 |
Fleetwood Town
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 24 |
Tranmere
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 25 |
Burnley
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 26 |
Notts County
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 27 |
Barnsley
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 28 |
Wigan
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 29 |
Preston
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 30 |
Huddersfield
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 31 |
QPR
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 32 |
Millwall
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 33 |
Bromley
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 34 |
Reading
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 35 |
Salford City
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 36 |
Shrewsbury
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 37 |
Stockport County
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 38 |
Doncaster
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 39 |
AFC Wimbledon
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 40 |
Newport County
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 41 |
Rochdale
|
2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 1 |
| 42 |
Swindon Town
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 43 |
Derby
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 44 |
Wycombe
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 45 |
Burton Albion
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 46 |
Accrington ST
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 47 |
Barnet
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 48 |
Northampton
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 49 |
Wrexham
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 50 |
Bolton
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 51 |
Swansea
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 52 |
Bristol City
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 53 |
Bristol Rovers
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 54 |
Chesterfield
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 55 |
Portsmouth
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 56 |
Grimsby
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 57 |
Oldham
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 58 |
York
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 59 |
Oxford
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 60 |
Milton Keynes Dons
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 0 |
| 61 |
Port Vale
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 0 |
| 62 |
Gillingham
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 0 |
Berechnet aus unseren Ergebnisdaten. „xG +/−“ ist die erwartete Tordifferenz — ein positiver Wert bei niedriger Tabellenposition deutet auf ein unterschätztes Team hin. Bei Punktgleichheit wird nach Tordifferenz sortiert; einzelne Ligen nutzen andere Regeln.
Trainer: Steve Cotterill
W. Mannion
G
D. McNamara
D
L. Jones
D
B. Koumetio
D
A. Bell
D
C. Coventry
M
N. Chalobah
M
T. Campbell
S. Carey
M
K. Grant
M
M. Godden
F
Trainer: Nathan Jones
Grüne Spalten sind die eingetretenen Ergebnisse.
Cheltenham
Leicester
Cheltenham
Buxton
Cheltenham
Bradford
Cardiff
Cheltenham
Cheltenham
Exeter City
Die Analyse ist eine statistische Schätzung auf Basis der Ergebnisse und der zugrunde liegenden Leistungen (xG) der Teams — keine Garantie. Siehe die Ergebnisse des Modells.