League Cup
Nachträgliche Analyse — das Modell wurde nur mit Spielen trainiert, die vor diesem stattfanden.
Modellens sannsynligheter for hjemmeseier, uavgjort og borteseier — med begrunnelse og anbefalte markeder.
Lås opp med ProHar du konto? Logg inn
Sheffield United
Wrexham
Forventede mål, over/under og begge lag scorer — priset av modellen før avspark.
Lås opp med ProHar du konto? Logg inn
Modellens topp sluttresultater med beste odds hos bookmakerne.
Lås opp med ProHar du konto? Logg inn
Halbzeitstand: 1–1
| # | Team | K | V | U | T | +/− | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Blackburn
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +5 | 3 |
| 2 |
Watford
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +5 | 3 |
| 3 |
Blackpool
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +4 | 3 |
| 4 |
Leyton Orient
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 3 |
| 5 |
Huddersfield
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 3 |
| 6 |
Tranmere
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 3 |
| 7 |
Crawley Town
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 8 |
Swansea
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 9 |
Preston
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 10 |
Cardiff
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 11 |
Oxford
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 12 |
Wycombe
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 13 |
Doncaster
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 14 |
Stoke
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 15 |
Norwich
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 16 |
Barrow
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 17 |
Derby
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 18 |
Rotherham
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 19 |
Harrogate Town
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 20 |
AFC Wimbledon
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 21 |
Fleetwood Town
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 22 |
QPR
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 23 |
Birmingham
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 24 |
Coventry
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 25 |
Millwall
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 26 |
Shrewsbury
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 27 |
Notts County
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 28 |
Colchester
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 29 |
Reading
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 30 |
Wigan
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 31 |
Barnsley
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 32 |
Bolton
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 33 |
Mansfield Town
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 34 |
Walsall
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 35 |
Exeter City
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 36 |
Grimsby
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 37 |
Bradford
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +0 | 1 |
| 38 |
Stevenage
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 39 |
Port Vale
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 40 |
Chesterfield
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 41 |
Crewe
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 42 |
Lincoln
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 43 |
Bromley
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 44 |
West Brom
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 45 |
Cambridge United
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 46 |
Charlton
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 47 |
Bristol City
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 48 |
Portsmouth
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 49 |
Swindon Town
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 50 |
Gillingham
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 51 |
Sunderland
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 52 |
Bristol Rovers
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 53 |
Peterborough
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 54 |
Northampton
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 55 |
Salford City
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 56 |
Carlisle
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| 57 |
Newport County
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 0 |
| 58 |
Morecambe
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 0 |
| 59 |
Accrington ST
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 0 |
| 60 |
Burton Albion
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 0 |
| 61 |
Stockport County
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 0 |
| 62 |
Milton Keynes Dons
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 0 |
Berechnet aus unseren Ergebnisdaten. „xG +/−“ ist die erwartete Tordifferenz — ein positiver Wert bei niedriger Tabellenposition deutet auf ein unterschätztes Team hin. Bei Punktgleichheit wird nach Tordifferenz sortiert; einzelne Ligen nutzen andere Regeln.
F. Seriki
D
A. Trusty
D
S. Peck
M
I. Coulibaly
M
A. Ben Slimane
M
L. Marsh
F
R. Brewster
F
Trainer: C. Wilder
L. Brunt
D
D. Scarr
D
G. Evans
M
O. Rathbone
F
S. Dalby
F
Trainer: P. Parkinson
Grüne Spalten sind die eingetretenen Ergebnisse.
Preston
Sheffield United
Sheffield United
Tottenham
Everton
Sheffield United
Sheffield United
Nott'm Forest
Newcastle
Sheffield United
K Stroud · 147 kamper i vår database
🟥 Rote Karten: 0,10 pro Spiel
Die Analyse ist eine statistische Schätzung auf Basis der Ergebnisse und der zugrunde liegenden Leistungen (xG) der Teams — keine Garantie. Siehe die Ergebnisse des Modells.