← Match Finder
Eredivisie
Referee: A Lindhout
Heracles
U S U S T
1–4
Full-time
Feyenoord
S S S S S

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Heracles Feyenoord
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 67%
33%
100%
Points per game
1,3
3,0
Over 2.5 Ø 50%
33%
67%
Both score Ø 50%
50%
50%
Average goals
2,0
4,2
Scored
0,8
3,3
Conceded
1,2
0,8
Goal diff per game
-0,3
+2,5
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Eredivisie · 30/30 matches
Win Ø 44%
27%
60%
Points per game
1,2
2,1
Over 2.5 Ø 55%
50%
60%
Both score Ø 62%
60%
63%
Average goals
3,0
3,3
Scored
1,2
2,3
Conceded
1,7
1,1
Goal diff per game
-0,5
+1,2
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 0–3

1,28 xG 2,40
43% Possession 57%
11 Shots 17
3 Shots on target 8
1 Blocked shots 4
4 Goalkeeper saves 2
5 Corners 1
2 Offside 0
11 Free kicks against 10
2 Yellow cards 1
1 Red cards 0
The table before the match Heracles 12. · Feyenoord 3.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Ajax 31 23 5 3 +36 +31.0 74
2 PSV Eindhoven 30 21 4 5 +55 +40.4 67
3 Feyenoord 30 18 8 4 +36 +24.2 62
4 Utrecht 31 18 8 5 +19 +4.1 62
5 Go Ahead Eagles 30 13 8 9 +6 +8.7 47
6 Twente 28 12 9 7 +11 +12.7 45
7 AZ Alkmaar 28 11 8 9 +5 +11.3 41
8 Heerenveen 30 11 7 12 -6 -1.0 40
9 For Sittard 30 10 6 14 -15 -6.0 36
10 Sparta Rotterdam 30 8 11 11 -3 -0.2 35
11 Groningen 30 9 8 13 -13 -8.6 35
12 Heracles 30 8 11 11 -15 -15.5 35
13 Nijmegen 30 9 7 14 +0 +2.5 34
14 NAC Breda 30 8 8 14 -18 -16.2 32
15 Zwolle 30 7 10 13 -13 -21.4 31
16 Willem II 31 6 7 18 -20 -29.0 25
17 Almere City 31 4 8 19 -38 -16.3 20
18 Waalwijk 30 4 7 19 -27 -20.5 19

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Heracles Feyenoord
9′
A. Hadj Moussa 0–1
A. Milambo
Ivan Mesík 🟨
33′
36′
A. Hadj Moussa 0–2
Half-time 0–2
46′
🔁 I. Osman
↦ A. Hadj Moussa
46′
🔁 R. Zerrouki
↦ Hwang In-Beom
46′
🔁 G. Smal
↦ Hugo Bueno
47′
Hwang In-Beom 0–3
Jan Žambůrek 🟨
47′
51′
🟨 Jakub Moder
J. Talvitie 🔁
↦ M. Engels
67′
D. van Kaam 🔁
↦ J. Žambůrek
67′
J. Wieckhoff 🔁
↦ M. Benita
72′
1–3 L. Kulenović
D. van Kaam
73′
74′
🔁 Q. Hartman
↦ J. Moder
78′
G. Read 1–4
I. Osman
83′
🔁 A. Sliti
↦ A. Milambo
Sem Scheperman ℹ️
VAR: Card upgrade
88′
Sem Scheperman 🟥
89′
Full-time 1–4

Line-ups

Heracles

4-4-1-1
1 F. de Keijzer G
2 M. Benita D
4 D. Mirani D
24 I. Mesík D
39 M. Rots D
29 S. Podgoreanu M
13 J. Žambůrek M
32 S. Scheperman M
8 M. Engels M
14 B. De Keersmaecker F
19 L. Kulenović F
Bench (11)
23 J. Talvitie
26 D. van Kaam
3 J. Wieckhoff
27 J. Tijink
22 L. Milani
30 R. Mantel
16 T. Jansink
18 K. Leerdam
20 D. van Oorschot
35 S. Bultman
7 B. Limbombe

Coach: E. van de Looi

Feyenoord

4-3-3
22 T. Wellenreuther G
26 G. Read D
3 T. Beelen D
33 D. Hancko D
16 Hugo Bueno D
4 Hwang In-Beom M
27 A. Milambo M
7 J. Moder M
23 A. Hadj Moussa F
9 A. Ueda F
14 Igor Paixão F
Bench (11)
38 I. Osman
6 R. Zerrouki
5 G. Smal
11 Q. Hartman
57 A. Sliti
28 O. Targhalline
31 S. Carrillo
48 D. Giersthove
64 I. Ka
43 J. Plug
39 L. Bossin

Coach: R. van Persie

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
5,20
U
4,42
B ✓
1,55
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,72
U2,5
2,09
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

A Lindhout · 161 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,0 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
20,4 / match
Average

🟥 Red cards: 0,12 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.