← Match Finder
Pro League
Referee: B Van Driessche
St. Gilloise
S S S S U
1–0
Full-time
Genk
S T T U T

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

St. Gilloise Genk
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 58%
83%
33%
Points per game
2,7
1,2
Over 2.5 Ø 50%
50%
50%
Both score Ø 42%
33%
50%
Average goals
2,5
2,3
Scored
2,2
1,3
Conceded
0,3
1,0
Goal diff per game
+1,8
+0,3
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Pro League · 26/26 matches
Win Ø 64%
62%
65%
Points per game
2,1
2,1
Over 2.5 Ø 60%
54%
65%
Both score Ø 54%
46%
62%
Average goals
2,5
2,9
Scored
1,8
1,8
Conceded
0,7
1,1
Goal diff per game
+1,1
+0,8
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 0–0

1,66 xG 0,77
47% Possession 53%
11 Shots 3
4 Shots on target 1
3 Blocked shots 1
1 Goalkeeper saves 3
4 Corners 2
0 Offside 1
17 Free kicks against 16
5 Yellow cards 4
0 Red cards 1
The table before the match St. Gilloise 2. · Genk 3.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Club Brugge 27 18 6 3 +37 +36.3 60
2 St. Gilloise 26 16 7 3 +29 +25.1 55
3 Genk 26 17 4 5 +20 +18.3 55
4 Anderlecht 27 15 6 6 +28 +8.6 51
5 Antwerp 26 11 10 5 +14 -2.5 43
6 Charleroi 25 9 8 8 +5 +5.3 35
7 Gent 27 9 8 10 -6 -12.6 35
8 Dender 27 8 9 10 -11 -13.8 33
9 Cercle Brugge 29 8 9 12 -17 -1.8 33
10 Westerlo 27 8 8 11 +0 +1.6 32
11 Standard 26 7 9 10 -14 -10.4 30
12 Mechelen 27 7 8 12 -5 +2.6 29
13 Kortrijk 29 8 3 18 -23 -15.3 27
14 Oud-Heverlee Leuven 27 4 14 9 -7 -6.7 26
15 St Truiden 28 6 7 15 -24 -9.3 25
16 Beerschot VA 28 3 8 17 -26 -25.3 17

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

St. Gilloise Genk
Promise David
penalty missed
19′
Charles Vanhoutte 🟨
41′
43′
🟨 Ibrahima Sory Bangoura
Half-time 0–0
Promise David 🟨
46′
51′
🟨 Ibrahima Sory Bangoura
51′
🟥 Ibrahima Sory Bangoura
Kamiel Van De Perre 🟨
56′
A. Ait El Hadj 🔁
↦ K. Van de Perre
60′
A. Castro-Montes 🔁
↦ O. Niang
60′
Kevin Mac Allister 🟨
66′
1–0 C. Burgess
C. Vanhoutte
67′
Christian Burgess 🟨
71′
M. Fuseini 🔁
↦ P. David
82′
87′
🔁 Y. Sor
↦ J. Steuckers
87′
🔁 K. Karetsas
↦ P. Hrošovský
87′
🔁 N. Adedeji-Sternberg
↦ C. Bonsu Baah
92′
🟨 Zakaria El Ouahdi
M. Rasmussen 🔁
↦ F. Ivanović
93′
95′
🟨 Bryan Heynen
Full-time 1–0

Line-ups

St. Gilloise

3-5-2
49 A. Moris G
5 K. Mac Allister D
16 C. Burgess D
28 K. Machida D
25 A. Khalaili M
6 K. Van de Perre M
24 C. Vanhoutte M
27 N. Sadiki M
22 O. Niang M
9 F. Ivanović F
12 P. David F
Bench (9)
10 A. Ait El Hadj
21 A. Castro-Montes
77 M. Fuseini
4 M. Rasmussen
14 J. Imbrechts
26 R. Sykes
13 K. Rodríguez
48 F. Leysen
11 H. Teklab

Coach: S. Pocognoli

Genk

4-2-3-1
39 M. Penders G
77 Z. El Ouahdi D
3 Mujaid Sadick D
6 M. Smets D
18 J. Kayembe D
21 I. Bangoura M
8 B. Heynen M
23 J. Steuckers M
17 P. Hrošovský M
7 C. Bonsu Baah M
99 T. Arokodare F
Bench (9)
14 Y. Sor
20 K. Karetsas
32 N. Adedeji-Sternberg
24 N. Sattlberger
19 Y. Medina
1 H. Van Crombrugge
44 J. Kongolo
9 Oh Hyeon-Gyu
27 K. Nkuba

Coach: T. Fink

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H ✓
1,89
U
3,74
B
3,72
Over/under goals
U1,5 ✓
O2,5
1,68
U2,5 ✓
2,15
U3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja
BLS nei ✓

Referee

B Van Driessche · 123 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
4,4 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
21,7 / match
Average

🟥 Red cards: 0,20 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.