← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: R Jones
Nott'm Forest
T T T U T
2–3
Full-time
Bournemouth
S S U S S

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Nott'm Forest Bournemouth
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 34%
0%
67%
Points per game
0,2
2,2
Over 2.5 Ø 59%
50%
67%
Both score Ø 50%
50%
50%
Average goals
3,3
3,7
Scored
0,8
2,2
Conceded
2,5
1,5
Goal diff per game
-1,7
+0,7
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 17/16 matches
Win Ø 25%
18%
31%
Points per game
0,8
1,2
Over 2.5 Ø 58%
47%
69%
Both score Ø 55%
53%
56%
Average goals
2,8
3,2
Scored
1,0
1,3
Conceded
1,8
1,9
Goal diff per game
-0,8
-0,6
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 0–0

1,02 xG 1,61
33% Possession 67%
11 Shots 18
5 Shots on target 7
5 Blocked shots 4
3 Goalkeeper saves 2
6 Corners 6
10 Free kicks against 10
0 Yellow cards 3
1 Red cards 0
The table before the match Nott'm Forest 17. · Bournemouth 15.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Arsenal 17 12 3 2 +20 +19.0 39
2 Aston Villa 18 12 3 3 +16 +8.2 39
3 Liverpool 17 11 5 1 +21 +14.3 38
4 Man City 17 10 4 3 +20 +15.9 34
5 Tottenham 17 10 3 4 +12 +0.7 33
6 West Ham 18 9 3 6 +1 -4.8 30
7 Newcastle 17 9 2 6 +15 +13.3 29
8 Man United 18 9 1 8 -5 -3.2 28
9 Brighton 18 7 6 5 +3 +2.6 27
10 Everton 17 8 2 7 +2 +5.1 26
11 Chelsea 17 6 4 7 +2 +9.4 22
12 Fulham 17 6 3 8 -3 -9.4 21
13 Brentford 17 5 4 8 +0 +8.0 19
14 Wolves 17 5 4 8 -8 -7.1 19
15 Bournemouth 16 5 4 7 -9 -5.7 19
16 Crystal Palace 18 4 6 8 -8 -2.2 18
17 Nott'm Forest 17 3 5 9 -13 -7.3 14
18 Luton 16 2 3 11 -15 -19.0 9
19 Sheffield United 18 2 3 13 -31 -23.9 9
20 Burnley 17 2 2 13 -20 -13.9 8

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Nott'm Forest Bournemouth
Willy Boly 🟨
5′
Willy Boly 🟨
23′
Willy Boly 🟥
23′
M. Niakhaté 🔁
↦ D. Origi
26′
29′
🔁 A. Scott
↦ L. Cook
31′
🟨 Alex Scott
Half-time 0–0
C. Hudson-Odoi 🔁
↦ O. Mangala
46′
1–0 A. Elanga
C. Wood
47′
51′
D. Solanke 1–1
M. Senesi
58′
D. Solanke 1–2
65′
🟨 Antoine Semenyo
68′
🟨 Ryan Christie
70′
🔁 J. Rothwell
↦ A. Scott
70′
🔁 L. Sinisterra
↦ A. Semenyo
2–2 C. Wood
M. Gibbs-White
74′
82′
🔁 D. Brooks
↦ P. Billing
82′
🔁 K. Moore
↦ Dango Ouattara
O. Aina 🔁
↦ H. Toffolo
85′
Danilo 🔁
↦ M. Gibbs-White
93′
94′
D. Solanke 2–3
A. Smith
Full-time 2–3

Line-ups

Nott'm Forest

4-2-3-1
1 M. Turner G
7 N. Williams D
40 Murillo D
30 W. Boly D
15 H. Toffolo D
22 R. Yates M
5 O. Mangala M
27 D. Origi M
10 M. Gibbs-White M
21 A. Elanga M
11 C. Wood F
Bench (9)
19 M. Niakhaté
14 C. Hudson-Odoi
43 O. Aina
28 Danilo
29 G. Montiel
16 N. Domínguez
8 C. Kouyaté
23 O. Vlachodimos
3 Nuno Tavares

Coach: Nuno Espírito Santo

Bournemouth

4-2-3-1
1 Neto G
15 A. Smith D
27 I. Zabarnyi D
25 M. Senesi D
11 Dango Ouattara D
4 L. Cook M
10 R. Christie M
24 A. Semenyo M
29 P. Billing M
16 M. Tavernier M
9 D. Solanke F
Bench (9)
14 A. Scott
8 J. Rothwell
17 L. Sinisterra
7 D. Brooks
21 K. Moore
19 J. Kluivert
6 C. Mepham
42 M. Travers
43 B. Greenwood

Coach: Andoni Iraola

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
2,76
U
3,49
B ✓
2,54
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,89
U2,5
1,95
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

R Jones · 186 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,8 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
23,5 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,07 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.