← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: S Barrott
Brentford
U U T S T
2–2
Full-time

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Brentford Crystal Palace
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 25%
17%
33%
Points per game
1,0
1,2
Over 2.5 Ø 84%
67%
100%
Both score Ø 50%
33%
67%
Average goals
2,2
3,5
Scored
1,0
1,3
Conceded
1,2
2,2
Goal diff per game
-0,2
-0,8
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 36/36 matches
Win Ø 35%
39%
31%
Points per game
1,4
1,2
Over 2.5 Ø 53%
53%
53%
Both score Ø 50%
50%
50%
Average goals
2,8
2,4
Scored
1,4
1,1
Conceded
1,4
1,3
Goal diff per game
+0,1
-0,3
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 1–1

1,71 xG 1,72
58% Possession 42%
14 Shots 16
3 Shots on target 5
3 Blocked shots 6
3 Goalkeeper saves 1
9 Corners 4
2 Offside 1
7 Free kicks against 5
1 Yellow cards 3
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Brentford 8. · Crystal Palace 15.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Arsenal 36 24 7 5 +42 +34.2 79
2 Man City 36 23 8 5 +43 +28.3 77
3 Man United 37 19 11 7 +16 +15.9 68
4 Aston Villa 37 18 8 11 +6 -6.1 62
5 Liverpool 37 17 8 12 +10 +11.8 59
6 Bournemouth 36 13 16 7 +4 +5.3 55
7 Brighton 36 14 11 11 +10 +6.8 53
8 Brentford 36 14 9 13 +3 +7.3 51
9 Chelsea 36 13 10 13 +6 +15.8 49
10 Everton 36 13 10 13 +0 -9.3 49
11 Fulham 36 14 6 16 -6 -6.7 48
12 Sunderland 36 12 12 12 -9 -16.4 48
13 Newcastle 36 13 7 16 -2 +6.5 46
14 Leeds 36 10 14 12 -5 +2.3 44
15 Crystal Palace 36 11 11 14 -9 +7.8 44
16 Nott'm Forest 37 11 10 16 -3 -11.7 43
17 Tottenham 36 9 11 16 -9 -13.1 38
18 West Ham 36 9 9 18 -20 -14.0 36
19 Burnley 36 4 9 23 -36 -40.6 21
20 Wolves 36 3 9 24 -41 -24.1 18

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Brentford Crystal Palace
4′
ℹ️ Ismaïla Sarr
VAR: Penalty confirmed
6′
I. Sarr 0–1
1–1 D. Ouattara
40′
Half-time 1–1
46′
🔁 B. Johnson
↦ Y. Pino
52′
A. Wharton 1–2
D. Munoz
61′
🔁 J. Mateta
↦ J. S. Larsen
61′
🔁 C. Richards
↦ M. Lacroix
J. Henderson 🔁
↦ V. Janelt
63′
K. Schade 🔁
↦ M. Jensen
63′
74′
🔁 J. Lerma
↦ C. Riad
S. van den Berg 🔁
↦ K. Ajer
82′
83′
🟨 Chris Richards
2–2 D. Ouattara
S. van den Berg
88′
89′
🟨 Jefferson Lerma
J. Dasilva 🔁
↦ Y. Yarmolyuk
89′
93′
🔁 E. Guessand
↦ I. Sarr
Michael Kayode 🟨
95′
95′
🟨 Dean Henderson
Full-time 2–2

Line-ups

Brentford

4-2-3-1
1 C. Kelleher G
33 M. Kayode D
20 K. Ajer D
22 N. Collins D
23 K. Lewis-Potter D
18 Y. Yarmolyuk M
27 V. Janelt M
19 D. Ouattara M
8 M. Jensen M
24 M. Damsgaard M
9 I. Thiago F
Bench (9)
12 H. R. Valdimarsson
6 J. Henderson
5 E. Pinnock
10 J. Dasilva
7 K. Schade
11 R. Nelson
4 S. van den Berg
2 A. Hickey
47 K. Furo

Coach: Keith Andrews

Crystal Palace

3-4-2-1
1 D. Henderson G
23 J. Canvot D
5 M. Lacroix D
34 C. Riad D
2 D. Munoz M
20 A. Wharton M
18 D. Kamada M
3 T. Mitchell M
7 I. Sarr F
10 Y. Pino F
22 J. S. Larsen F
Bench (9)
44 W. Benitez
17 N. Clyne
19 W. Hughes
11 B. Johnson
8 J. Lerma
14 J. Mateta
29 E. Guessand
26 C. Richards
55 J. Devenny

Coach: Oliver Glasner

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
1,71
U ✓
4,09
B
4,17
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,65
U2,5
2,18
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

S Barrott · 111 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,5 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
20,4 / match
Average

🟥 Red cards: 0,06 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.