← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: M Salisbury
Ipswich
U T T U T
2–4
Full-time
Nott'm Forest
T T U U S

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Ipswich Nott'm Forest
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 17%
17%
17%
Points per game
0,8
1,0
Over 2.5 Ø 50%
50%
50%
Both score Ø 75%
83%
67%
Average goals
3,3
2,8
Scored
1,5
1,3
Conceded
1,8
1,5
Goal diff per game
-0,3
-0,2
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 28/28 matches
Win Ø 33%
11%
54%
Points per game
0,6
1,8
Over 2.5 Ø 50%
50%
50%
Both score Ø 52%
61%
43%
Average goals
3,0
2,8
Scored
0,9
1,6
Conceded
2,1
1,2
Goal diff per game
-1,1
+0,4
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 0–3

0,42 xG 1,52
56% Possession 44%
11 Shots 11
4 Shots on target 6
2 Blocked shots 1
2 Goalkeeper saves 1
6 Corners 3
1 Offside 1
4 Free kicks against 13
1 Yellow cards 1
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Ipswich 18. · Nott'm Forest 3.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Liverpool 29 21 7 1 +42 +40.9 70
2 Arsenal 28 15 10 3 +28 +20.3 55
3 Nott'm Forest 28 15 6 7 +12 +1.7 51
4 Chelsea 28 14 7 7 +17 +17.3 49
5 Man City 28 14 5 9 +15 +12.6 47
6 Newcastle 28 14 5 9 +9 +10.6 47
7 Brighton 28 12 10 6 +6 +2.5 46
8 Aston Villa 29 12 9 8 -4 +1.6 45
9 Bournemouth 28 12 8 8 +13 +13.5 44
10 Fulham 28 11 9 8 +3 +6.7 42
11 Crystal Palace 28 10 9 9 +3 +8.2 39
12 Brentford 28 11 5 12 +4 +0.3 38
13 Tottenham 28 10 4 14 +14 -1.1 34
14 Man United 28 9 7 12 -6 -6.0 34
15 Everton 28 7 12 9 -4 -3.8 33
16 West Ham 28 9 6 13 -16 -9.8 33
17 Wolves 28 6 5 17 -19 -13.6 23
18 Ipswich 28 3 8 17 -32 -30.1 17
19 Leicester 28 4 5 19 -37 -29.1 17
20 Southampton 28 2 3 23 -48 -42.8 9

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Ipswich Nott'm Forest
35′
N. Milenković 0–1
37′
A. Elanga 0–2
E. Anderson
41′
A. Elanga 0–3
N. Milenković
Half-time 0–3
C. Burgess 🔁
↦ J. Greaves
46′
Kalvin Phillips 🟨
54′
64′
🟨 Nicolás Domínguez
67′
🔁 R. Yates
↦ N. Domínguez
67′
🔁 Morato
↦ A. Elanga
G. Hirst 🔁
↦ L. Delap
79′
N. Broadhead 🔁
↦ J. Enciso
80′
J. Clarke 🔁
↦ J. Philogene
80′
80′
🔁 T. Awoniyi
↦ C. Wood
81′
🔁 Jota Silva
↦ C. Hudson-Odoi
1–3 J. Cajuste
J. Clarke
82′
J. Taylor 🔁
↦ K. Phillips
86′
87′
Jota Silva 1–4
M. Gibbs-White
89′
🔁 Danilo
↦ M. Gibbs-White
2–4 G. Hirst
D. O'Shea
93′
Full-time 2–4

Line-ups

Ipswich

4-2-3-1
31 A. Palmer G
26 D. O'Shea D
6 L. Woolfenden D
24 J. Greaves D
3 L. Davis D
8 K. Phillips M
12 J. Cajuste M
29 J. Philogene M
20 O. Hutchinson M
9 J. Enciso M
19 L. Delap F
Bench (9)
15 C. Burgess
27 G. Hirst
33 N. Broadhead
47 J. Clarke
14 J. Taylor
5 Sam Morsy
18 B. Johnson
22 C. Townsend
28 C. Walton

Coach: K. McKenna

Nott'm Forest

4-2-3-1
26 M. Sels G
34 O. Aina D
31 N. Milenković D
5 Murillo D
7 N. Williams D
16 N. Domínguez M
8 E. Anderson M
21 A. Elanga M
10 M. Gibbs-White M
14 C. Hudson-Odoi M
11 C. Wood F
Bench (9)
22 R. Yates
4 Morato
9 T. Awoniyi
20 Jota Silva
28 Danilo
13 W. Hennessey
30 W. Boly
19 Álex Moreno
6 I. Sangaré

Coach: Nuno Espírito Santo

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
3,80
U
3,59
B ✓
1,99
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,85
U2,5
1,99
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

M Salisbury · 127 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,3 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
22,3 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,15 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.