← Match Finder
Serie A
Referee: L Pairetto
Como
S S U S S
5–0
Full-time
Pisa
T T T T S

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Como Pisa
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 42%
67%
17%
Points per game
2,3
0,7
Over 2.5 Ø 50%
50%
50%
Both score Ø 50%
67%
33%
Average goals
2,3
2,2
Scored
1,7
0,7
Conceded
0,7
1,5
Goal diff per game
+1,0
-0,8
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Serie A · 29/29 matches
Win Ø 30%
52%
7%
Points per game
1,9
0,6
Over 2.5 Ø 45%
45%
45%
Both score Ø 45%
45%
45%
Average goals
2,4
2,5
Scored
1,7
0,8
Conceded
0,8
1,7
Goal diff per game
+0,9
-0,9
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 2–0

1,40 xG 0,44
73% Possession 27%
14 Shots 7
7 Shots on target 0
1 Blocked shots 4
0 Goalkeeper saves 2
7 Corners 1
2 Offside 3
5 Free kicks against 6
0 Yellow cards 2
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Como 4. · Pisa 19.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Inter 29 22 2 5 +42 +35.0 68
2 Milan 30 18 9 3 +24 +16.9 63
3 Napoli 30 19 5 6 +16 +10.5 62
4 Como 29 15 9 5 +26 +20.8 54
5 Juventus 30 15 9 6 +23 +29.3 54
6 Roma 29 16 3 10 +16 +7.2 51
7 Atalanta 29 12 11 6 +13 +11.4 47
8 Bologna 29 12 6 11 +4 +0.3 42
9 Lazio 29 10 10 9 +1 -7.1 40
10 Sassuolo 30 11 6 13 -4 -13.2 39
11 Udinese 30 11 6 13 -7 -10.3 39
12 Parma 30 8 10 12 -17 -17.9 34
13 Genoa 30 8 9 13 -6 +0.7 33
14 Torino 30 9 6 15 -19 -8.3 33
15 Cagliari 30 7 9 14 -11 -16.3 30
16 Fiorentina 29 6 10 13 -9 +5.8 28
17 Lecce 29 7 6 16 -18 -19.9 27
18 Cremonese 30 6 9 15 -19 -19.2 27
19 Pisa 29 2 12 15 -26 -16.6 18
20 Verona 29 3 9 17 -29 -9.0 18

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Como Pisa
1–0 A. Diao
7′
2–0 A. Douvikas
A. Diao
29′
35′
🟨 Simone Canestrelli
M. Baturina 🔁
↦ J. Rodriguez
37′
Half-time 2–0
46′
🔁 H. Meister
↦ E. Akinsanmiro
3–0 M. Baturina
48′
51′
🟨 Samuele Angori
51′
🔁 F. Stojilkovic
↦ S. Moreo
A. Morata 🔁
↦ A. Douvikas
59′
M. Caqueret 🔁
↦ L. Da Cunha
59′
64′
🔁 C. Stengs
↦ F. Loyola
4–0 N. Paz
A. Moreno
75′
76′
🔁 S. Iling Junior
↦ S. Canestrelli
76′
🔁 G. Piccinini
↦ M. Tramoni
E. Goldaniga 🔁
↦ Diego Carlos
77′
N. Kuhn 🔁
↦ A. Diao
77′
5–0 M. Perrone
N. Kuhn
81′
Full-time 5–0

Line-ups

Como

4-2-3-1
1 J. Butez G
77 I. Van der Brempt D
34 Diego Carlos D
2 M. O. Kempf D
18 A. Moreno D
23 M. Perrone M
33 L. Da Cunha M
38 A. Diao M
10 N. Paz M
17 J. Rodriguez M
11 A. Douvikas F
Bench (14)
22 M. Vigorito
44 N. Cavlina
21 N. Tornqvist
7 A. Morata
31 M. Vojvoda
28 I. Smolcic
3 A. Valle
56 C. De Paoli
8 S. Roberto
5 E. Goldaniga
6 M. Caqueret
19 N. Kuhn
20 M. Baturina
15 A. Lahdo

Coach: Cesc Fabregas

Pisa

3-5-2
12 Nicolas Andrade G
4 A. Caracciolo D
39 R. Albiol D
5 S. Canestrelli D
7 M. Leris M
35 F. Loyola M
8 M. Hojholt M
14 E. Akinsanmiro M
3 S. Angori M
32 S. Moreo F
10 M. Tramoni F
Bench (13)
1 A. Semper
31 M. Luppichini
33 A. Calabresi
15 I. Toure
26 F. Coppola
19 S. Iling Junior
9 H. Meister
99 Lorran
42 B. Bettazzi
23 C. Stengs
81 F. Stojilkovic
36 G. Piccinini
2 R. Bozhinov

Coach: Oscar Hiljemark

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H ✓
1,24
U
5,63
B
11,81
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,68
U2,5
2,11
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja
BLS nei ✓

Referee

L Pairetto · 119 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
4,6 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
25,4 / match
Average

🟥 Red cards: 0,27 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.