← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: C Kavanagh
Chelsea
S S S S S
1–1
Full-time
Nott'm Forest
U U S U T

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Chelsea Nott'm Forest
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 58%
83%
33%
Points per game
2,7
1,5
Over 2.5 Ø 42%
67%
17%
Both score Ø 50%
50%
50%
Average goals
3,8
1,8
Scored
3,0
1,0
Conceded
0,8
0,8
Goal diff per game
+2,2
+0,2
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 50%
67%
33%
Points per game
2,2
1,5
Over 2.5 Ø 34%
50%
17%
Both score Ø 50%
50%
50%
Average goals
3,7
1,8
Scored
2,5
1,0
Conceded
1,2
0,8
Goal diff per game
+1,3
+0,2
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 0–0

2,46 xG 0,87
66% Possession 34%
22 Shots 16
8 Shots on target 9
5 Blocked shots 6
8 Goalkeeper saves 7
11 Corners 3
1 Offside 3
12 Free kicks against 11
6 Yellow cards 2
0 Red cards 1
The table before the match Chelsea 4. · Nott'm Forest 11.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Liverpool 7 6 0 1 +11 +9.1 18
2 Man City 7 5 2 0 +9 +6.1 17
3 Arsenal 7 5 2 0 +9 +5.6 17
4 Chelsea 6 4 1 1 +8 +5.2 13
5 Aston Villa 6 4 1 1 +3 +3.2 13
6 Newcastle 7 3 3 1 +1 +0.1 12
7 Fulham 7 3 2 2 +2 +2.8 11
8 Tottenham 6 3 1 2 +7 +7.3 10
9 Brentford 7 3 1 3 +0 -2.0 10
10 Brighton 6 2 3 1 +2 -0.8 9
11 Nott'm Forest 6 2 3 1 +1 +2.1 9
12 West Ham 7 2 2 3 -1 -0.2 8
13 Bournemouth 7 2 2 3 -2 +2.9 8
14 Man United 6 2 1 3 -3 -0.5 7
15 Leicester 7 1 3 3 -3 -9.8 6
16 Everton 7 1 2 4 -8 -4.9 5
17 Ipswich 7 0 4 3 -8 -10.6 4
18 Crystal Palace 7 0 3 4 -5 -2.4 3
19 Southampton 7 0 1 6 -11 -5.7 1
20 Wolves 7 0 1 6 -12 -7.4 1

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Chelsea Nott'm Forest
Moisés Caicedo 🟨
21′
36′
🟨 James Ward-Prowse
Half-time 0–1
49′
C. Wood 0–1
N. Milenković
1–1 N. Madueke
C. Palmer
57′
66′
🔁 Jota Silva
↦ E. Anderson
Cole Palmer 🟨
75′
76′
🔁 N. Domínguez
↦ M. Gibbs-White
78′
🟨 James Ward-Prowse
78′
🟥 James Ward-Prowse
João Félix 🔁
↦ E. Fernández
81′
C. Nkunku 🔁
↦ N. Jackson
81′
82′
🔁 Morato
↦ C. Hudson-Odoi
82′
🔁 N. Williams
↦ Álex Moreno
82′
🔁 A. Elanga
↦ C. Wood
Levi Colwill 🟨
89′
Marc Cucurella 🟨
89′
89′
🟨 Neco Williams
Pedro Neto 🔁
↦ N. Madueke
90′
M. Mudryk 🔁
↦ J. Sancho
90′
T. Adarabioyo 🔁
↦ L. Colwill
93′
95′
🟨 Matz Sels
Pedro Neto 🟨
98′
Wesley Fofana 🟨
102′
Full-time 1–1

Line-ups

Chelsea

4-2-3-1
1 Robert Sánchez G
27 M. Gusto D
29 W. Fofana D
6 L. Colwill D
3 Marc Cucurella D
25 M. Caicedo M
8 E. Fernández M
11 N. Madueke M
20 C. Palmer M
19 J. Sancho M
15 N. Jackson F
Bench (9)
14 João Félix
18 C. Nkunku
7 Pedro Neto
10 M. Mudryk
4 T. Adarabioyo
12 F. Jørgensen
2 A. Disasi
45 R. Lavia
40 Renato Veiga

Coach: E. Maresca

Nott'm Forest

4-2-3-1
26 M. Sels G
34 O. Aina D
31 N. Milenković D
5 Murillo D
19 Álex Moreno D
22 R. Yates M
18 J. Ward-Prowse M
14 C. Hudson-Odoi M
10 M. Gibbs-White M
8 E. Anderson M
11 C. Wood F
Bench (9)
20 Jota Silva
16 N. Domínguez
4 Morato
7 N. Williams
21 A. Elanga
30 W. Boly
33 Carlos Miguel
9 T. Awoniyi
24 R. Sosa

Coach: Nuno Espírito Santo

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
1,48
U ✓
4,73
B
6,32
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5
1,55
U2,5 ✓
2,46
U3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

C Kavanagh · 171 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,8 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
21,9 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,16 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.