← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: G Scott
5–2
Full-time
West Ham
U S T T U

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Crystal Palace West Ham
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 17%
17%
17%
Points per game
0,8
0,8
Over 2.5 Ø 33%
33%
33%
Both score Ø 67%
67%
67%
Average goals
2,7
3,0
Scored
1,0
1,2
Conceded
1,7
1,8
Goal diff per game
-0,7
-0,7
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 32/33 matches
Win Ø 32%
25%
39%
Points per game
1,0
1,5
Over 2.5 Ø 59%
53%
64%
Both score Ø 65%
63%
67%
Average goals
2,8
3,3
Scored
1,2
1,6
Conceded
1,7
1,8
Goal diff per game
-0,5
-0,2
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 4–1

2,36 xG 1,27
61% Possession 39%
18 Shots 4
7 Shots on target 1
2 Blocked shots 1
0 Goalkeeper saves 3
4 Corners 0
0 Offside 5
9 Free kicks against 9
3 Yellow cards 2
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Crystal Palace 16. · West Ham 8.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Arsenal 33 23 5 5 +51 +42.6 74
2 Man City 32 22 7 3 +44 +37.5 73
3 Liverpool 32 21 8 3 +41 +36.2 71
4 Aston Villa 33 19 6 8 +19 +6.3 63
5 Tottenham 32 18 6 8 +16 +2.2 60
6 Newcastle 32 15 5 12 +17 +7.6 50
7 Man United 32 15 5 12 -1 -12.2 50
8 West Ham 33 13 9 11 -6 -14.9 48
9 Chelsea 31 13 8 10 +9 +14.3 47
10 Brighton 32 11 11 10 +2 +1.5 44
11 Wolves 33 12 7 14 -7 -11.9 43
12 Fulham 33 12 6 15 -2 -9.1 42
13 Bournemouth 32 11 9 12 -10 -1.7 42
14 Everton 33 10 8 15 -14 -0.4 38
15 Brentford 34 9 8 17 -7 +5.6 35
16 Crystal Palace 32 8 9 15 -17 -9.2 33
17 Nott'm Forest 34 7 9 18 -18 -4.4 30
18 Luton 34 6 7 21 -28 -33.4 25
19 Burnley 34 5 8 21 -32 -25.3 23
20 Sheffield United 33 3 7 23 -57 -31.5 16

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Crystal Palace West Ham
1–0 M. Olise
J. Andersen
7′
2–0 E. Eze
16′
2–1 Emerson
own goal
20′
27′
🟨 Michail Antonio
3–1 J. Mateta
M. Olise
31′
Will Hughes 🟨
39′
40′
M. Antonio 3–2
T. Souček
Half-time 3–2
46′
🔁 B. Johnson
↦ T. Souček
46′
🔁 A. Cresswell
↦ A. Ogbonna
Tyrick Mitchell 🟨
53′
53′
🟨 Tomáš Souček
N. Ahamada 🔁
↦ A. Wharton
61′
4–2 J. Mateta
E. Eze
64′
Naouirou Ahamada 🟨
66′
O. Édouard 🔁
↦ J. Mateta
68′
J. Ayew 🔁
↦ M. Olise
68′
75′
🔁 K. Phillips
↦ E. Álvarez
75′
🔁 D. Ings
↦ M. Antonio
J. Riedewald 🔁
↦ W. Hughes
81′
J. Schlupp 🔁
↦ E. Eze
81′
85′
🔁 M. Cornet
↦ M. Kudus
89′
D. Henderson 5–2
own goal
Full-time 5–2

Line-ups

Crystal Palace

3-4-2-1
30 D. Henderson G
17 N. Clyne D
16 J. Andersen D
26 C. Richards D
12 D. Muñoz M
20 A. Wharton M
19 W. Hughes M
3 T. Mitchell M
7 M. Olise F
10 E. Eze F
14 J. Mateta F
Bench (9)
29 N. Ahamada
22 O. Édouard
9 J. Ayew
44 J. Riedewald
15 J. Schlupp
2 J. Ward
31 R. Matthews
4 R. Holding
5 J. Tomkins

Coach: O. Glasner

West Ham

4-2-3-1
1 Ł. Fabiański G
5 V. Coufal D
4 K. Zouma D
21 A. Ogbonna D
33 Emerson D
28 T. Souček M
19 E. Álvarez M
14 M. Kudus M
7 J. Ward-Prowse M
10 Lucas Paquetá M
9 M. Antonio F
Bench (9)
2 B. Johnson
3 A. Cresswell
11 K. Phillips
18 D. Ings
17 M. Cornet
42 K. Casey
23 A. Areola
61 L. Orford
45 D. Mubama

Coach: D. Moyes

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H ✓
2,15
U
3,59
B
3,34
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,79
U2,5
2,04
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

G Scott · 87 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,4 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
21,9 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,16 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.