Pro League
Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.
The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
Beerschot VA
Seraing United
Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
Half-time score: 1–0
| # | Team | K | V | U | T | +/− | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
St. Gilloise
|
10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | +16 | 25 |
| 2 |
Anderlecht
|
11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | +14 | 22 |
| 3 |
Kortrijk
|
13 | 6 | 3 | 4 | +3 | 21 |
| 4 |
Charleroi
|
11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | +12 | 20 |
| 5 |
Genk
|
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | +9 | 20 |
| 6 |
Antwerp
|
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | +6 | 20 |
| 7 |
Eupen
|
14 | 6 | 2 | 6 | +2 | 20 |
| 8 |
Mechelen
|
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | +1 | 20 |
| 9 |
Oostende
|
14 | 6 | 2 | 6 | -5 | 20 |
| 10 |
Club Brugge
|
9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | +6 | 18 |
| 11 |
Standard
|
13 | 5 | 3 | 5 | -6 | 18 |
| 12 |
St Truiden
|
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | -5 | 15 |
| 13 |
Oud-Heverlee Leuven
|
12 | 2 | 7 | 3 | -5 | 13 |
| 14 |
Waregem
|
13 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -11 | 13 |
| 15 |
Seraing United
|
12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | -8 | 12 |
| 16 | Seraing | 13 | 4 | 0 | 9 | -11 | 12 |
| 17 |
Gent
|
9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | +4 | 11 |
| 18 |
Cercle Brugge
|
13 | 2 | 3 | 8 | -7 | 9 |
| 19 |
Beerschot VA
|
13 | 1 | 2 | 10 | -15 | 5 |
Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.
M. Caicedo
M
L. Shankland
F
Coach: J. Torrente
A. Bernier
F
G. Mikautadze
F
Coach: Jordi Condom
Green columns are the outcomes that came in.
Beerschot VA
Anderlecht
Beerschot VA
Beerschot VA
Mechelen
Oud-Heverlee Leuven
Beerschot VA
Beerschot VA
Eupen
K Van Damme · 99 kamper i vår database
🟥 Red cards: 0,28 per match
The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.