← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: C Pawson
Man City
S U S S S
5–1
Full-time
Wolves
T U T T S

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Man City Wolves
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 42%
67%
17%
Points per game
2,3
0,8
Over 2.5 Ø 50%
50%
50%
Both score Ø 59%
50%
67%
Average goals
3,5
2,5
Scored
2,7
1,0
Conceded
0,8
1,5
Goal diff per game
+1,8
-0,5
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 34/35 matches
Win Ø 54%
71%
37%
Points per game
2,3
1,3
Over 2.5 Ø 63%
62%
63%
Both score Ø 64%
62%
66%
Average goals
3,4
2,9
Scored
2,4
1,4
Conceded
0,9
1,6
Goal diff per game
+1,5
-0,2
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 3–0

3,74 xG 0,35
58% Possession 42%
20 Shots 2
12 Shots on target 1
3 Blocked shots 1
0 Goalkeeper saves 7
6 Corners 0
2 Offside 2
4 Free kicks against 17
0 Yellow cards 4
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Man City 2. · Wolves 11.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Arsenal 36 26 5 5 +60 +45.9 83
2 Man City 34 24 7 3 +50 +37.2 79
3 Liverpool 35 22 9 4 +41 +38.2 75
4 Aston Villa 35 20 7 8 +21 +6.5 67
5 Tottenham 34 18 6 10 +13 +3.0 60
6 Newcastle 35 17 5 13 +22 +11.2 56
7 Man United 34 16 6 12 +1 -9.4 54
8 Chelsea 34 14 9 11 +6 +13.6 51
9 West Ham 35 13 10 12 -9 -17.1 49
10 Bournemouth 36 13 9 14 -11 -2.8 48
11 Wolves 35 13 7 15 -7 -12.7 46
12 Everton 36 12 9 15 -11 -0.6 45
13 Fulham 36 12 8 16 -4 -8.5 44
14 Brighton 34 11 11 12 -5 -0.4 44
15 Crystal Palace 35 10 10 15 -12 -7.7 40
16 Brentford 36 9 9 18 -8 +5.0 36
17 Nott'm Forest 36 8 9 19 -18 -4.1 33
18 Luton 36 6 8 22 -29 -34.7 26
19 Burnley 36 5 9 22 -35 -28.4 24
20 Sheffield United 36 3 7 26 -65 -34.4 16

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Man City Wolves
1–0 E. Haaland
12′
2–0 E. Haaland
Rodri
35′
41′
🟨 Mario Lemina
Erling Haaland ℹ️
VAR: Penalty confirmed
45′
Half-time 2–0
46′
🔁 J. Bellegarde
↦ M. Lemina
47′
🟨 Nélson Semedo
3–0 E. Haaland
48′
53′
Hwang Hee-Chan 3–1
4–1 E. Haaland
P. Foden
54′
64′
🟨 Boubacar Traoré
66′
🟨 João Gomes
J. Stones 🔁
↦ N. Aké
69′
71′
🔁 S. Bueno
↦ Hugo Bueno
76′
🔁 Pablo Sarabia
↦ Matheus Cunha
Matheus Nunes 🔁
↦ K. De Bruyne
79′
J. Grealish 🔁
↦ P. Foden
80′
J. Doku 🔁
↦ Bernardo Silva
80′
J. Álvarez 🔁
↦ E. Haaland
82′
5–1 J. Álvarez
Rodri
85′
87′
🔁 T. Chirewa
↦ Hwang Hee-Chan
Full-time 5–1

Line-ups

Man City

4-2-3-1
31 Ederson G
2 K. Walker D
25 M. Akanji D
6 N. Aké D
24 J. Gvardiol D
16 Rodri M
8 M. Kovačić M
20 Bernardo Silva M
17 K. De Bruyne M
47 P. Foden M
9 E. Haaland F
Bench (9)
5 J. Stones
27 Matheus Nunes
10 J. Grealish
11 J. Doku
19 J. Álvarez
82 R. Lewis
18 S. Ortega
3 Rúben Dias
21 Sergio Gómez

Coach: Pep Guardiola

Wolves

3-5-2
1 José Sá G
22 Nélson Semedo D
23 M. Kilman D
24 Toti Gomes D
3 R. Aït-Nouri M
8 João Gomes M
5 M. Lemina M
6 B. Traoré M
17 Hugo Bueno M
11 Hwang Hee-Chan F
12 Matheus Cunha F
Bench (9)
27 J. Bellegarde
4 S. Bueno
21 Pablo Sarabia
62 T. Chirewa
30 E. González
61 W. Okoduwa
2 M. Doherty
25 D. Bentley
63 N. Fraser

Coach: G. O'Neil

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H ✓
1,09
U
11,51
B
25,33
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,30
U2,5
3,52
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

C Pawson · 173 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,8 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
22,7 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,12 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.