← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: L Smith
Chelsea
S T S U S
1–1
Full-time
Burnley
U T T S T

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Chelsea Burnley
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 42%
67%
17%
Points per game
2,2
0,8
Over 2.5 Ø 75%
83%
67%
Both score Ø 67%
67%
67%
Average goals
3,8
3,2
Scored
2,5
1,2
Conceded
1,3
2,0
Goal diff per game
+1,2
-0,8
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 26/26 matches
Win Ø 31%
46%
15%
Points per game
1,7
0,7
Over 2.5 Ø 60%
65%
54%
Both score Ø 62%
65%
58%
Average goals
3,0
3,0
Scored
1,8
1,1
Conceded
1,2
2,0
Goal diff per game
+0,7
-0,9
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 1–0

1,99 xG 0,85
67% Possession 33%
12 Shots 12
2 Shots on target 4
5 Blocked shots 2
3 Goalkeeper saves 1
9 Corners 5
2 Offside 4
13 Free kicks against 11
2 Yellow cards 2
1 Red cards 0
The table before the match Chelsea 5. · Burnley 19.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Arsenal 27 17 7 3 +32 +27.8 58
2 Man City 26 16 5 5 +30 +18.2 53
3 Aston Villa 26 15 5 6 +10 -4.4 50
4 Man United 26 12 9 5 +10 +13.3 45
5 Chelsea 26 12 8 6 +17 +13.8 44
6 Liverpool 26 12 6 8 +6 +12.2 42
7 Brentford 26 12 4 10 +5 +5.5 40
8 Everton 26 10 7 9 -1 -7.4 37
9 Bournemouth 26 9 10 7 -2 +3.1 37
10 Newcastle 26 10 6 10 +0 +8.8 36
11 Sunderland 26 9 9 8 -3 -14.7 36
12 Fulham 26 10 4 12 -5 -6.3 34
13 Crystal Palace 26 8 8 10 -4 +7.5 32
14 Brighton 26 7 10 9 +0 +2.4 31
15 Leeds 26 7 9 10 -9 -1.8 30
16 Tottenham 26 7 8 11 -1 -9.9 29
17 Nott'm Forest 26 7 6 13 -13 -8.1 27
18 West Ham 26 6 6 14 -17 -14.3 24
19 Burnley 26 4 6 16 -23 -29.3 18
20 Wolves 27 1 7 19 -32 -16.4 10

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Chelsea Burnley
-5′
🟨 Josh Laurent
1–0 Joao Pedro
P. Neto
4′
30′
🟨 Hannibal Mejbri
Wesley Fofana 🟨
34′
Half-time 1–0
46′
🔁 Lucas Pires
↦ K. Walker
57′
🔁 J. Ward-Prowse
↦ L. Ugochukwu
Wesley Fofana 🟨
72′
Wesley Fofana 🟥
72′
T. Adarabioyo 🔁
↦ C. Palmer
75′
78′
🔁 J. Bruun Larsen
↦ J. Laurent
L. Delap 🔁
↦ Joao Pedro
80′
J. Hato 🔁
↦ M. Gusto
80′
83′
🔁 L. Tchaouna
↦ B. Humphreys
84′
🔁 A. Barnes
↦ J. Anthony
M. Sarr 🔁
↦ P. Neto
88′
J. Acheampong 🔁
↦ R. James
89′
Robert Sánchez 🟨
90′
90′
Z. Flemming 1–1
J. Ward-Prowse
Jorrel Hato 🟨
94′
Full-time 1–1

Line-ups

Chelsea

4-2-3-1
1 R. Sanchez G
24 R. James D
29 W. Fofana D
23 T. Chalobah D
27 M. Gusto D
25 M. Caicedo M
17 Andrey Santos M
10 C. Palmer M
8 E. Fernandez M
7 P. Neto M
20 Joao Pedro F
Bench (9)
44 G. Slonina
49 A. Garnacho
19 M. Sarr
38 M. Guiu
4 T. Adarabioyo
9 L. Delap
45 R. Lavia
21 J. Hato
34 J. Acheampong

Coach: Calum McFarlane

Burnley

3-4-2-1
1 M. Dubravka G
2 K. Walker D
4 J. Worrall D
5 M. Esteve D
29 J. Laurent M
8 L. Ugochukwu M
28 H. Mejbri M
12 B. Humphreys M
10 M. Edwards F
11 J. Anthony F
19 Z. Flemming F
Bench (9)
13 M. Weiss
17 L. Tchaouna
3 Q. Hartman
23 Lucas Pires
20 J. Ward-Prowse
35 A. Barnes
7 J. Bruun Larsen
16 Florentino
18 H. Ekdal

Coach: Mike Jackson

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
1,20
U ✓
6,70
B
12,88
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5
1,42
U2,5 ✓
2,73
U3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

L Smith · 66 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,6 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
21,5 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,11 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.