← Match Finder
2. Bundesliga
Referee: R Hempel
Darmstadt
U U T T T
3–3
Full-time
Elversberg
T S U T S

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Darmstadt Elversberg
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 34%
17%
50%
Points per game
0,8
1,7
Over 2.5 Ø 42%
33%
50%
Both score Ø 59%
67%
50%
Average goals
2,7
2,5
Scored
1,2
1,5
Conceded
1,5
1,0
Goal diff per game
-0,3
+0,5
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — 2. Bundesliga · 30/30 matches
Win Ø 48%
43%
53%
Points per game
1,7
1,8
Over 2.5 Ø 55%
57%
53%
Both score Ø 57%
60%
53%
Average goals
3,0
2,8
Scored
1,7
1,7
Conceded
1,2
1,1
Goal diff per game
+0,5
+0,7
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 2–3

1,29 xG 1,20
47% Possession 53%
13 Shots 17
4 Shots on target 4
4 Blocked shots 3
1 Goalkeeper saves 1
5 Corners 7
1 Offside 0
10 Free kicks against 19
2 Yellow cards 2
1 Red cards 0
The table before the match Darmstadt 5. · Elversberg 4.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Schalke 04 30 18 7 5 +19 +14.8 61
2 Paderborn 30 17 7 6 +17 +15.4 58
3 Hannover 31 16 9 6 +16 +12.6 57
4 Elversberg 30 16 7 7 +20 +7.2 55
5 Darmstadt 30 13 11 6 +15 +2.7 50
6 Hertha 31 13 9 9 +8 -2.1 48
7 Kaiserslautern 31 14 4 13 +3 -1.1 46
8 Karlsruhe 31 11 7 13 -11 -20.6 40
9 Nurnberg 30 10 8 12 -2 +0.3 38
10 Holstein Kiel 31 10 8 13 -3 -11.6 38
11 Bochum 30 9 9 12 +0 +4.2 36
12 Dresden 31 9 8 14 +0 +1.0 35
13 Bielefeld 31 9 8 14 -1 +1.8 35
14 Braunschweig 31 9 7 15 -16 -2.3 34
15 Fortuna Dusseldorf 31 10 4 17 -18 -5.6 34
16 Magdeburg 30 10 3 17 -7 +7.6 33
17 Greuther Furth 30 9 6 15 -20 -10.7 33
18 Preußen Münster 31 6 10 15 -20 -13.5 28

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Darmstadt Elversberg
1–0 P. Pfeiffer
H. Akiyama
14′
2–0 F. Hornby
15′
26′
T. Zimmerschied 2–1
34′
M. Rohr 2–2
L. Petkov
Patric Pfeiffer 🟥
44′
45′
L. Petkov 2–3
Half-time 2–3
A. Vukotic 🔁
↦ Y. Furukawa
47′
Raoul Petretta 🟨
49′
3–3 F. Hornby
I. Lidberg
51′
Marco Richter 🟨
57′
63′
🔁 J. Gyamerah
↦ F. Keidel
F. Lakenmacher 🔁
↦ F. Hornby
64′
64′
🔁 F. Schmahl
↦ A. Conde
F. Holland 🔁
↦ R. Petretta
65′
69′
🟨 Łukasz Poręba
75′
🔁 J. Malanga
↦ L. Poreba
75′
🔁 L. Schnellbacher
↦ D. Mokwa Ntusu
85′
🟨 Lukas Finn Pinckert
85′
🔁 L. Pfeiffer
↦ I. Pherai
Full-time 3–3

Line-ups

Darmstadt

4-2-3-1
1 M. Schuhen G
2 S. Lopez D
6 P. Pfeiffer D
5 M. Maglica D
18 R. Petretta D
17 K. Klefisch M
16 H. Akiyama M
23 M. Richter M
9 F. Hornby M
44 Y. Furukawa M
7 I. Lidberg F
Bench (9)
30 A. Brunst
21 M. Papela
27 B. Bialek
32 F. Holland
31 N. Schmidt
20 A. Vukotic
19 F. Lakenmacher
22 S. Guler
34 K. Corredor

Coach: Florian Kohfeldt

Elversberg

4-2-3-1
20 N. Kristof G
43 F. Keidel D
19 L. Pinckert D
31 M. Rohr D
21 L. Gunther D
6 A. Conde M
8 L. Poreba M
25 L. Petkov M
22 I. Pherai M
29 T. Zimmerschied M
42 D. Mokwa Ntusu F
Bench (9)
28 T. Boss
16 L. Pfeiffer
2 N. Mickelson
17 F. Schmahl
14 J. Malanga
30 J. Gyamerah
24 L. Schnellbacher
23 C. Sickinger
15 R. Adam

Coach: Vincent Wagner

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
2,65
U ✓
3,62
B
2,28
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,47
U2,5
2,51
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

R Hempel · 39 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
4,6 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
24,8 / match
Average

🟥 Red cards: 0,28 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.