← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: P Bankes
Fulham
T S S U U
2–1
Full-time
Chelsea
S U T U U

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Fulham Chelsea
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 42%
50%
33%
Points per game
1,8
1,5
Over 2.5 Ø 59%
50%
67%
Both score Ø 75%
67%
83%
Average goals
2,7
3,2
Scored
1,5
1,8
Conceded
1,2
1,3
Goal diff per game
+0,3
+0,5
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 20/20 matches
Win Ø 40%
40%
40%
Points per game
1,4
1,6
Over 2.5 Ø 55%
50%
60%
Both score Ø 60%
60%
60%
Average goals
2,9
2,8
Scored
1,4
1,7
Conceded
1,5
1,1
Goal diff per game
-0,1
+0,6
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 0–0

1,20 xG 2,39
55% Possession 45%
16 Shots 14
5 Shots on target 6
8 Blocked shots 3
4 Goalkeeper saves 3
2 Corners 11
1 Offside 2
11 Free kicks against 6
3 Yellow cards 3
0 Red cards 1
The table before the match Fulham 11. · Chelsea 5.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Arsenal 20 15 3 2 +26 +21.6 48
2 Man City 20 13 3 4 +26 +15.7 42
3 Aston Villa 20 13 3 4 +9 -5.2 42
4 Liverpool 20 10 4 6 +4 +8.8 34
5 Chelsea 20 8 7 5 +11 +6.4 31
6 Man United 20 8 7 5 +4 +9.1 31
7 Brentford 20 9 3 8 +4 +4.6 30
8 Sunderland 20 7 9 4 +2 -11.3 30
9 Newcastle 20 8 5 7 +4 +7.4 29
10 Brighton 20 7 7 6 +3 +4.1 28
11 Fulham 20 8 4 8 -1 -3.9 28
12 Everton 20 8 4 8 -2 -7.3 28
13 Tottenham 20 7 6 7 +4 -6.5 27
14 Crystal Palace 20 7 6 7 -1 +6.1 27
15 Bournemouth 20 5 8 7 -7 +1.4 23
16 Leeds 20 5 7 8 -7 -0.4 22
17 Nott'm Forest 21 6 3 12 -13 -4.8 21
18 West Ham 21 3 5 13 -21 -14.8 14
19 Burnley 20 3 3 14 -19 -21.5 12
20 Wolves 20 1 3 16 -26 -9.5 6

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Fulham Chelsea
22′
🟥 Marc Cucurella
24′
🟨 Enzo Fernández
25′
🟨 Cole Palmer
25′
🟨 Tosin Adarabioyo
28′
🔁 J. Hato
↦ Andrey Santos
Half-time 0–0
Kevin 🔁
↦ J. Cuenca
46′
Harry Wilson ℹ️
VAR: Goal cancelled
50′
Jorge Cuenca 🟨
52′
1–0 R. Jimenez
S. Berge
55′
65′
🔁 R. James
↦ E. Fernandez
72′
L. Delap 1–1
S. Lukic 🔁
↦ T. Cairney
73′
R. Sessegnon 🔁
↦ A. Robinson
73′
75′
🔁 Joao Pedro
↦ C. Palmer
76′
🔁 J. Acheampong
↦ M. Gusto
Timothy Castagne 🟨
78′
2–1 H. Wilson
81′
H. Reed 🔁
↦ E. Smith Rowe
83′
Raúl Jiménez 🟨
90′
A. Traore 🔁
↦ H. Wilson
91′
Full-time 2–1

Line-ups

Fulham

3-4-2-1
1 B. Leno G
31 I. Diop D
5 J. Andersen D
15 J. Cuenca D
21 T. Castagne M
16 S. Berge M
10 T. Cairney M
33 A. Robinson M
8 H. Wilson F
32 E. Smith Rowe F
7 R. Jimenez F
Bench (9)
23 B. Lecomte
20 S. Lukic
11 A. Traore
30 R. Sessegnon
22 Kevin
35 S. Amissah
18 J. Kusi Asare
6 H. Reed
38 S. Ridgeon

Coach: Marco Silva

Chelsea

4-2-3-1
1 R. Sanchez G
27 M. Gusto D
23 T. Chalobah D
4 T. Adarabioyo D
3 M. Cucurella D
17 Andrey Santos M
25 M. Caicedo M
10 C. Palmer M
8 E. Fernandez M
7 P. Neto M
9 L. Delap F
Bench (9)
12 F. Jorgensen
24 R. James
29 W. Fofana
20 Joao Pedro
11 J. Gittens
49 A. Garnacho
41 Estêvão
21 J. Hato
34 J. Acheampong

Coach: Calum McFarlane

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H ✓
3,38
U
3,59
B
2,07
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,77
U2,5
2,00
U3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

P Bankes · 156 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
4,1 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
21,6 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,12 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.