Championship
Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.
The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
Bolton
Brighton
Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.
Unlock with ProAlready have an account? Log in
Half-time score: 1–2
| # | Team | K | V | U | T | +/− | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Brighton
|
8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | +6 | 20 |
| 2 |
Middlesbrough
|
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | +9 | 17 |
| 3 |
Burnley
|
8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | +3 | 15 |
| 4 |
Hull
|
8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | +5 | 14 |
| 5 |
Derby
|
9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | +3 | 14 |
| 6 |
Ipswich
|
8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | +0 | 14 |
| 7 |
Reading
|
8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | +6 | 12 |
| 8 |
Birmingham
|
7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | +4 | 12 |
| 9 |
Cardiff
|
8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | +2 | 12 |
| 10 |
Nott'm Forest
|
9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | +0 | 12 |
| 11 |
QPR
|
9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | -3 | 12 |
| 12 |
Fulham
|
8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | +4 | 11 |
| 13 |
Leeds
|
8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | +1 | 11 |
| 14 |
Huddersfield
|
9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | -1 | 10 |
| 15 |
Sheffield Weds
|
8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | -2 | 9 |
| 16 |
Charlton
|
8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | -2 | 9 |
| 17 |
Brentford
|
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -2 | 8 |
| 18 |
Wolves
|
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -2 | 8 |
| 19 |
Blackburn
|
8 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +0 | 7 |
| 20 |
Milton Keynes Dons
|
9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 7 |
| 21 |
Bolton
|
8 | 1 | 4 | 3 | -6 | 7 |
| 22 |
Preston
|
8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -4 | 6 |
| 23 |
Rotherham
|
8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 24 |
Bristol City
|
8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.
B. Amos
G
Green columns are the outcomes that came in.
Huddersfield
Bolton
Bolton
Sheffield Weds
Bolton
Wolves
Blackburn
Bolton
Bolton
Nott'm Forest
The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.