← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: S Hooper
Chelsea
T T U S U
3–1
Full-time
Wolves
S U T S T

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Chelsea Wolves
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 34%
17%
50%
Points per game
1,0
1,7
Over 2.5 Ø 67%
50%
83%
Both score Ø 42%
50%
33%
Average goals
2,7
3,0
Scored
1,5
1,5
Conceded
1,2
1,5
Goal diff per game
+0,3
+0,0
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 21/21 matches
Win Ø 34%
48%
19%
Points per game
1,8
0,8
Over 2.5 Ø 69%
57%
81%
Both score Ø 69%
71%
67%
Average goals
3,2
3,8
Scored
2,0
1,5
Conceded
1,2
2,3
Goal diff per game
+0,7
-0,8
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 1–1

3,15 xG 0,86
63% Possession 37%
19 Shots 9
7 Shots on target 4
6 Blocked shots 3
3 Goalkeeper saves 3
3 Corners 6
5 Offside 2
8 Free kicks against 14
4 Yellow cards 2
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Chelsea 6. · Wolves 17.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Liverpool 21 15 5 1 +30 +31.5 50
2 Arsenal 22 12 8 2 +22 +17.9 44
3 Nott'm Forest 22 13 5 4 +11 +3.5 44
4 Man City 22 11 5 6 +15 +9.8 38
5 Newcastle 22 11 5 6 +12 +10.4 38
6 Chelsea 21 10 7 4 +15 +12.6 37
7 Bournemouth 22 10 7 5 +10 +14.9 37
8 Aston Villa 22 10 6 6 -1 +6.5 36
9 Brighton 22 8 10 4 +5 -1.2 34
10 Fulham 22 8 9 5 +4 +5.1 33
11 Brentford 22 8 4 10 +1 -2.8 28
12 Crystal Palace 22 6 9 7 -3 -0.4 27
13 Man United 22 7 5 10 -5 -1.1 26
14 West Ham 22 7 5 10 -16 -9.1 26
15 Tottenham 22 7 3 12 +10 +0.8 24
16 Everton 21 4 8 9 -10 -7.6 20
17 Wolves 21 4 4 13 -17 -12.4 16
18 Ipswich 22 3 7 12 -23 -25.4 16
19 Leicester 22 3 5 14 -25 -22.7 14
20 Southampton 22 1 3 18 -35 -30.2 6

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Chelsea Wolves
1–0 T. Adarabioyo
24′
Tosin Adarabioyo ℹ️
VAR: Goal confirmed
26′
41′
🟨 André
Half-time 1–1
50′
M. Doherty 1–1
Tosin Adarabioyo 🟨
52′
2–1 Marc Cucurella
K. Dewsbury-Hall
60′
J. Sancho 🔁
↦ Pedro Neto
62′
3–1 N. Madueke
T. Chalobah
65′
Moisés Caicedo 🟨
70′
74′
🔁 J. Bellegarde
↦ André
74′
🔁 Rodrigo Gomes
↦ R. Aït-Nouri
74′
🔁 Gonçalo Guedes
↦ Pablo Sarabia
M. Gusto 🔁
↦ K. Dewsbury-Hall
77′
A. Disasi 🔁
↦ R. James
77′
João Félix 🔁
↦ C. Palmer
84′
T. George 🔁
↦ N. Madueke
84′
Tyrique George 🟨
88′
90′
🟨 Nélson Semedo
Robert Sánchez 🟨
94′
Full-time 3–1

Line-ups

Chelsea

4-2-3-1
1 Robert Sánchez G
24 R. James D
4 T. Adarabioyo D
23 T. Chalobah D
3 Marc Cucurella D
22 K. Dewsbury-Hall M
25 M. Caicedo M
11 N. Madueke M
20 C. Palmer M
7 Pedro Neto M
15 N. Jackson F
Bench (9)
19 J. Sancho
27 M. Gusto
2 A. Disasi
14 João Félix
32 T. George
34 J. Acheampong
38 Marc Guiu
18 C. Nkunku
12 F. Jørgensen

Coach: E. Maresca

Wolves

3-4-2-1
1 José Sá G
2 M. Doherty D
4 S. Bueno D
12 E. Agbadou D
22 Nélson Semedo M
7 André M
8 João Gomes M
3 R. Aït-Nouri M
21 Pablo Sarabia F
10 Matheus Cunha F
9 J. Strand Larsen F
Bench (9)
27 J. Bellegarde
19 Rodrigo Gomes
29 Gonçalo Guedes
15 C. Dawson
31 S. Johnstone
20 T. Doyle
37 Pedro Lima
11 Hwang Hee-Chan
26 Carlos Forbs

Coach: Vítor Pereira

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H ✓
1,37
U
5,51
B
7,30
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,37
U2,5
3,06
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

S Hooper · 168 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,7 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
22,0 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,05 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.