← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: P Bankes
Wolves
T T S S U
0–3
Full-time
Nott'm Forest
S S S S S

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Wolves Nott'm Forest
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 58%
33%
83%
Points per game
1,2
2,5
Over 2.5 Ø 67%
83%
50%
Both score Ø 42%
50%
33%
Average goals
3,2
2,7
Scored
1,5
1,7
Conceded
1,7
1,0
Goal diff per game
-0,2
+0,7
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 19/19 matches
Win Ø 40%
21%
58%
Points per game
0,8
1,9
Over 2.5 Ø 61%
79%
42%
Both score Ø 58%
74%
42%
Average goals
3,8
2,4
Scored
1,6
1,4
Conceded
2,2
1,0
Goal diff per game
-0,6
+0,4
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 0–2

1,59 xG 2,13
61% Possession 39%
13 Shots 11
6 Shots on target 3
5 Blocked shots 2
0 Goalkeeper saves 5
5 Corners 3
1 Offside 4
10 Free kicks against 8
1 Yellow cards 2
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Wolves 17. · Nott'm Forest 3.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Liverpool 19 14 4 1 +28 +27.1 46
2 Arsenal 20 11 7 2 +21 +16.9 40
3 Nott'm Forest 19 11 4 4 +7 +3.5 37
4 Chelsea 20 10 6 4 +15 +11.3 36
5 Newcastle 20 10 5 5 +12 +11.3 35
6 Man City 20 10 4 6 +9 +7.7 34
7 Bournemouth 20 9 6 5 +7 +14.8 33
8 Aston Villa 20 9 5 6 -2 +6.7 32
9 Fulham 20 7 9 4 +3 +2.4 30
10 Brighton 20 6 10 4 +1 -2.3 28
11 Brentford 20 8 3 9 +3 -0.5 27
12 Tottenham 20 7 3 10 +12 +2.3 24
13 Man United 20 6 5 9 -5 -2.5 23
14 West Ham 20 6 5 9 -15 -7.1 23
15 Crystal Palace 20 4 9 7 -7 -1.6 21
16 Everton 19 3 8 8 -10 -8.4 17
17 Wolves 19 4 4 11 -11 -11.4 16
18 Ipswich 20 3 7 10 -15 -22.3 16
19 Leicester 20 3 5 12 -21 -20.9 14
20 Southampton 20 1 3 16 -32 -27.2 6

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Wolves Nott'm Forest
7′
M. Gibbs-White 0–1
A. Elanga
16′
🟨 Elliot Anderson
30′
🟨 Nicolás Domínguez
44′
C. Wood 0–2
C. Hudson-Odoi
Half-time 0–2
Tommy Doyle 🟨
46′
J. Bellegarde 🔁
↦ Pedro Lima
59′
M. Lemina 🔁
↦ T. Doyle
59′
60′
🔁 Morato
↦ N. Domínguez
69′
🔁 Jota Silva
↦ E. Anderson
69′
🔁 R. Yates
↦ A. Elanga
Carlos Forbs 🔁
↦ Hwang Hee-Chan
75′
Pablo Sarabia 🔁
↦ Gonçalo Guedes
75′
88′
🔁 J. Ward-Prowse
↦ M. Gibbs-White
88′
🔁 T. Awoniyi
↦ C. Wood
94′
T. Awoniyi 0–3
J. Ward-Prowse
Full-time 0–3

Line-ups

Wolves

3-4-2-1
1 José Sá G
2 M. Doherty D
4 S. Bueno D
3 R. Aït-Nouri D
37 Pedro Lima M
20 T. Doyle M
8 João Gomes M
19 Rodrigo Gomes M
29 Gonçalo Guedes F
11 Hwang Hee-Chan F
9 J. Strand Larsen F
Bench (9)
27 J. Bellegarde
5 M. Lemina
26 Carlos Forbs
21 Pablo Sarabia
31 S. Johnstone
61 W. Okoduwa
34 L. Cundle
46 A. Pond
33 B. Meupiyou

Coach: Vítor Pereira

Nott'm Forest

4-2-3-1
26 M. Sels G
34 O. Aina D
31 N. Milenković D
5 Murillo D
7 N. Williams D
16 N. Domínguez M
8 E. Anderson M
21 A. Elanga M
10 M. Gibbs-White M
14 C. Hudson-Odoi M
11 C. Wood F
Bench (9)
4 Morato
20 Jota Silva
22 R. Yates
18 J. Ward-Prowse
9 T. Awoniyi
24 R. Sosa
33 Carlos Miguel
30 W. Boly
19 Álex Moreno

Coach: Nuno Espírito Santo

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
3,22
U
3,22
B ✓
2,33
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
2,04
U2,5
1,78
U3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja
BLS nei ✓

Referee

P Bankes · 156 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
4,1 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
21,6 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,12 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.