← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: D Coote
Wolves
T T S U T
2–1
Full-time
Chelsea
S T T S U

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Wolves Chelsea
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 33%
33%
33%
Points per game
1,2
1,2
Over 2.5 Ø 59%
67%
50%
Both score Ø 67%
67%
67%
Average goals
2,8
3,2
Scored
1,2
1,3
Conceded
1,7
1,8
Goal diff per game
-0,5
-0,5
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 17/17 matches
Win Ø 32%
29%
35%
Points per game
1,1
1,3
Over 2.5 Ø 59%
65%
53%
Both score Ø 65%
76%
53%
Average goals
2,9
3,2
Scored
1,2
1,6
Conceded
1,7
1,5
Goal diff per game
-0,5
+0,1
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 0–0

1,27 xG 2,06
32% Possession 68%
14 Shots 16
6 Shots on target 5
5 Blocked shots 7
3 Goalkeeper saves 4
10 Corners 6
3 Offside 0
11 Free kicks against 9
3 Yellow cards 5
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Wolves 15. · Chelsea 11.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Arsenal 18 12 4 2 +20 +18.7 40
2 Liverpool 18 11 6 1 +21 +14.6 39
3 Aston Villa 18 12 3 3 +16 +8.2 39
4 Tottenham 18 11 3 4 +13 +0.4 36
5 Man City 17 10 4 3 +20 +15.9 34
6 West Ham 18 9 3 6 +1 -4.8 30
7 Newcastle 18 9 2 7 +14 +13.4 29
8 Man United 18 9 1 8 -5 -3.2 28
9 Brighton 18 7 6 5 +3 +2.6 27
10 Everton 18 8 2 8 +1 +5.4 26
11 Chelsea 17 6 4 7 +2 +9.4 22
12 Bournemouth 17 6 4 7 -8 -5.1 22
13 Fulham 18 6 3 9 -5 -8.4 21
14 Brentford 17 5 4 8 +0 +8.0 19
15 Wolves 17 5 4 8 -8 -7.1 19
16 Crystal Palace 18 4 6 8 -8 -2.2 18
17 Nott'm Forest 18 3 5 10 -14 -7.9 14
18 Luton 17 3 3 11 -14 -19.1 12
19 Burnley 18 3 2 13 -18 -14.9 11
20 Sheffield United 18 2 3 13 -31 -23.9 9

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Wolves Chelsea
-5′
🟨 Marcus Bettinelli
Mario Lemina 🟨
27′
30′
🟨 Conor Gallagher
Half-time 1–0
1–0 M. Lemina
Pablo Sarabia
51′
56′
🟨 Cole Palmer
59′
🔁 C. Nkunku
↦ L. Ugochukwu
59′
🔁 M. Mudryk
↦ A. Broja
60′
🟨 Malo Gusto
62′
🟨 Nicolas Jackson
Matheus Cunha 🟨
64′
S. Bueno 🔁
↦ C. Dawson
70′
T. Doyle 🔁
↦ Pablo Sarabia
75′
79′
🔁 I. Maatsen
↦ L. Colwill
80′
🔁 N. Madueke
↦ N. Jackson
80′
🔁 B. Badiashile
↦ M. Gusto
M. Doherty 🔁
↦ Matheus Cunha
86′
Hugo Bueno 🔁
↦ R. Aït-Nouri
87′
2–0 M. Doherty
93′
96′
C. Nkunku 2–1
R. Sterling
99′
🟨 Raheem Sterling
Hugo Bueno 🟨
100′
Full-time 2–1

Line-ups

Wolves

3-4-2-1
1 José Sá G
23 M. Kilman D
15 C. Dawson D
24 Toti Gomes D
22 Nélson Semedo M
5 M. Lemina M
8 João Gomes M
3 R. Aït-Nouri M
11 Hwang Hee-Chan F
21 Pablo Sarabia F
12 Matheus Cunha F
Bench (9)
4 S. Bueno
20 T. Doyle
2 M. Doherty
17 Hugo Bueno
62 T. Chirewa
18 S. Kalajdžić
79 O. Hesketh
45 T. Barnett
25 D. Bentley

Coach: G. O'Neil

Chelsea

4-2-3-1
28 Đ. Petrović G
27 M. Gusto D
2 A. Disasi D
6 Thiago Silva D
26 L. Colwill D
16 L. Ugochukwu M
23 C. Gallagher M
20 C. Palmer M
15 N. Jackson M
7 R. Sterling M
19 A. Broja F
Bench (9)
18 C. Nkunku
10 M. Mudryk
29 I. Maatsen
11 N. Madueke
5 B. Badiashile
52 A. Matos
47 L. Bergström
45 R. Lavia
13 M. Bettinelli

Coach: M. Pochettino

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H ✓
3,73
U
3,73
B
1,98
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,83
U2,5
2,02
U3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

D Coote · 118 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
4,1 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
23,5 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,10 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.