#	Team	K	S	U	T	Goals	+/-	P	Form
1	Club Brugge	30	24	2	4	76 – 33	+43	74	S S S U S
2	St. Gilloise	30	19	9	2	52 – 20	+32	66	T S T U S
3	St Truiden	30	17	4	9	45 – 30	+15	55	S T U T S
4	Genk	30	12	11	7	47 – 38	+9	47	S U U S U
5	Mechelen	30	11	10	9	39 – 43	-4	43	S T U U T
6	Gent	30	11	9	10	38 – 40	-2	42	U U U T U
7	Waregem	30	12	4	14	46 – 47	-1	40	S S S S S
8	Standard	30	11	7	12	32 – 39	-7	40	S S U S T
9	Antwerp	30	11	6	13	34 – 36	-2	39	T T T U S
10	Anderlecht	30	10	8	12	45 – 49	-4	38	T U U S T
11	Cercle Brugge	30	10	7	13	49 – 51	-2	37	S S S T T
12	Charleroi	30	10	6	14	36 – 38	-2	36	S S T U S
13	Westerlo	30	9	8	13	40 – 50	-10	35	U T S T T
14	Oud-Heverlee Leuven	30	6	9	15	31 – 48	-17	27	U T S U T
15	RAAL La Louviere	30	5	10	15	27 – 44	-17	25	T T T T S
16	Dender	32	4	7	21	29 – 61	-32	19	T S T T U
17	Lommel United	6	5	1	0	14 – 5	+9	16	S S S S U
18	Beerschot VA	4	1	1	2	6 – 9	-3	4	U S T T
19	Patro Eisden	2	0	1	1	3 – 4	-1	1	U T
20	Liège	2	0	0	2	1 – 5	-4	0	T T

#	Team	K	S	U	T	Goals	+/-	P	Form
1	St. Gilloise	15	14	1	0	36 – 6	+30	43	S S U S S
2	Club Brugge	15	12	1	2	45 – 18	+27	37	S S S S S
3	St Truiden	15	10	1	4	22 – 15	+7	31	T S S U S
4	Genk	15	6	6	3	22 – 15	+7	24	U U U S U
5	Gent	15	6	5	4	18 – 12	+6	23	U T U U U
6	Waregem	15	7	2	6	23 – 19	+4	23	T S U S S
7	Antwerp	15	6	3	6	19 – 20	-1	21	T S T T S
8	Anderlecht	15	5	5	5	27 – 22	+5	20	S T T U S
9	Mechelen	15	5	5	5	18 – 19	-1	20	T T T S U
10	Charleroi	15	4	4	7	19 – 21	-2	16	S T S T U
11	Westerlo	15	4	4	7	20 – 23	-3	16	S T T U T
12	RAAL La Louviere	15	3	6	6	13 – 17	-4	15	U U T T S
13	Oud-Heverlee Leuven	15	3	4	8	17 – 22	-5	13	T T T S T
14	Cercle Brugge	15	3	3	9	24 – 31	-7	12	T T S S T
15	Standard	15	2	6	7	12 – 22	-10	12	T T S U T
16	Lommel United	3	3	0	0	9 – 3	+6	9	S S S
17	Dender	16	2	3	11	14 – 33	-19	9	T T T S U
18	Beerschot VA	2	1	0	1	4 – 5	-1	3	S T
19	Patro Eisden	1	0	1	0	1 – 1	+0	1	U
20	Liège	1	0	0	1	1 – 2	-1	0	T

#	Team	K	S	U	T	Goals	+/-	P	Form
1	Club Brugge	15	12	1	2	31 – 15	+16	37	S T S S U
2	Standard	15	9	1	5	20 – 17	+3	28	S S U S S
3	Cercle Brugge	15	7	4	4	25 – 20	+5	25	T S U S T
4	St Truiden	15	7	3	5	23 – 15	+8	24	T U S T T
5	Genk	15	6	5	4	25 – 23	+2	23	S T U S U
6	St. Gilloise	15	5	8	2	16 – 14	+2	23	S S T T U
7	Mechelen	15	6	5	4	21 – 24	-3	23	U T T U T
8	Charleroi	15	6	2	7	17 – 17	+0	20	T U S S S
9	Westerlo	15	5	4	6	20 – 27	-7	19	S S T S T
10	Gent	15	5	4	6	20 – 28	-8	19	T U T U T
11	Antwerp	15	5	3	7	15 – 16	-1	18	T S S T U
12	Anderlecht	15	5	3	7	18 – 27	-9	18	T S T U T
13	Waregem	15	5	2	8	23 – 28	-5	17	T T S S S
14	Oud-Heverlee Leuven	15	3	5	7	14 – 26	-12	14	U T U T U
15	Dender	16	2	4	10	15 – 28	-13	10	T S T T T
16	RAAL La Louviere	15	2	4	9	14 – 27	-13	10	U U T T T
17	Lommel United	3	2	1	0	5 – 2	+3	7	S S U
18	Beerschot VA	2	0	1	1	2 – 4	-2	1	U T
19	Patro Eisden	1	0	0	1	2 – 3	-1	0	T
20	Liège	1	0	0	1	0 – 3	-3	0	T

#	Team	K	xGoals	xG +/-	xP	P	Deviation
1	St. Gilloise	30	51,0 – 26,7	+24,2	55,1	66	+10,9
2	Club Brugge	30	59,2 – 36,0	+23,2	54,5	74	+19,5
3	St Truiden	30	49,1 – 34,0	+15,1	51,3	55	+3,7
4	Genk	30	51,2 – 39,4	+11,8	49,4	47	-2,4
5	Cercle Brugge	30	50,0 – 46,4	+3,7	44,1	37	-7,1
6	Gent	30	44,1 – 40,7	+3,3	44,0	42	-2,0
7	Anderlecht	30	44,0 – 46,4	-2,3	41,4	38	-3,4
8	Westerlo	30	45,3 – 48,7	-3,4	40,3	35	-5,3
9	Antwerp	30	41,3 – 42,4	-1,0	39,9	39	-0,9
10	Charleroi	30	37,3 – 39,4	-2,1	39,9	36	-3,9
11	Waregem	30	44,2 – 49,2	-4,9	38,6	40	+1,4
12	Oud-Heverlee Leuven	30	36,5 – 47,2	-10,7	34,8	27	-7,8
13	Standard	30	36,5 – 48,1	-11,6	34,5	40	+5,5
14	Mechelen	30	36,1 – 50,4	-14,3	33,8	43	+9,2
15	RAAL La Louviere	30	30,5 – 41,3	-10,8	33,4	25	-8,4
16	Dender	30	36,0 – 56,1	-20,1	30,2	18	-12,2
17	Beerschot VA	1	2,5 – 1,3	+1,1	2,1	0	-2,1
18	Lommel United	1	1,3 – 2,5	-1,1	0,8	3	+2,2

The table is calculated from played matches in our database (3 points for a win, 1 for a draw) and may differ from the official one in case of point deductions or other sanctions. Click a team for the full team analysis.

The xG table shows how the table “should” have looked: for each match we calculate the probability of a win, draw and loss from the xG numbers and sum the expected points (xP). Teams with a negative deviation have taken fewer points than their play suggests — they are often better than their league position. Only matches with xG data are counted.